How you train is far more important than the equipment you use. Proper training with very limited or basic equipment will produce better results, more quickly, more efficiently, and more safely than training incorrectly on the best equipment in the world. There is no specific piece of exercise equipment you must have, no specific exercises you must teach your clients to produce good results. I have trained people at home with a basic free weight set up consisting of nothing more than a power rack, adjustable bench, and a few Olympic bars and dumbbell handles. I have also trained people in facilities equipped with a large selection of the best machines in the world. I was able to provide clients with safe, effective, and efficient workouts with both.
This is not meant as an endorsement of free weights or criticism of machines; both have advantages and disadvantages. My point is you shouldn’t obsess over a particular type or brand of equipment if you don’t have the budget or space for it when starting out. The most important thing is providing your clients with exercises for all the major muscle groups which are safe, effective, and efficient and this can be done with a variety of equipment.
That being said, if you do have the space and you can afford it I recommend selectorized machines for several reasons.
Machine exercises are generally easier for you to teach and for clients to learn and master than free weight and body weight exercises which require additional elements of balance and control. When used properly most machine exercises are also safer than free weight and body weight exercises since the resistance is confined to a set path and range of motion and usually can not be dropped onto the client like a barbell or dumbbells and the client is generally in a position where there is no risk of them losing their balance or grip and falling which can be a concern during some body weight exercises.
Selectorized machines can be set up in seconds which is important if you want clients to move quickly between exercises or are sharing a studio with one or more busy trainers and only have a single line of machines or use certain ones frequently. Loading and unloading barbells and plate-loaded machines is inefficient and requires you either to take your attention off the client while setting up their next exercise or to allow them to rest longer between exercises when you are not able to set up all their bars or machines ahead of time or when you are using the same bar for several exercises. Moving plates around all day can also be hard on trainers, especially smaller females and older people.
If you don’t mind dealing with plates plate-loaded machines tend to cost less and are low maintenance, however it is important to consider the additional cost of plates, plate storage (some plate-loaded machines have built-in storage), and the additional space required to be able to load the machines. If you are a smaller female or older person or employ one I recommend having plenty of twenty five pound plates so they aren’t required to spend a lot of time moving around forty fives. I also recommend buying forty five pound plates with built in grips to make carrying easier.
If you can only afford or only have space for a few machines when starting out prioritize machines which replace higher risk or more challenging free weight and body weight exercises so you can better accommodate a greater number of potential clients. For example, not everybody can squat safely and not everybody can perform chin ups but most people can perform leg presses and pulldowns. A good basic line includes a leg press, pull down, chest press, compound row, overhead press, and trunk extension. More machines are nice to have and allow you to provide a greater variety of exercises and work around certain physical limitations more easily but these few are all most people really need.
Stay away from multi-exercise stations like those commonly found in hotel and apartment fitness centers. Most are very poorly designed, compromising the quality of exercise movements for the sake of quantity. If you have very limited space you are better off getting a good power rack and adjustable bench or dumbbells and a chin up and dip station or multi-exercise bodyweight station like the UXS.
I prefer fixed, hexagonal dumbbells as they are durable and won’t roll when set down and take up little space if you have a vertical or three-level rack. Adjustable dumbbells like PowerBlocks and the Nautilus SelectTech are far more space efficient but a pair can only be used by one person at a time. Stay away from adjustable plate loaded dumbbells, especially those with screw-on collars; they take much longer to load and unload than a barbell which can be a problem if you plan to use them for more than one or two exercises in a workout with different weights. While this might not seem like a big deal when you have to do it multiple times per hour all day long it adds up.
Adjustable dual cable machines like the Nautilus Freedom Trainer and the FreeMotion Dual Cable Cross can be used with different grip and bar attachments for a variety of exercises and also take up little space. If you have the budget for one it is a better option than dumbbells because it provides a greater variety of exercises and clients can’t drop anything on themselves.
If you work with people in wheelchairs you can adjust the booms around them to perform different exercises which is safer and more efficient than having them move between and transfer into and out of several different machines with progressively more fatigued arms. I was able to put a paraplegic woman I trained through most of her workouts using just the Nautilus Freedom Trainer pictured below.
Some of you might be wondering why I haven’t mentioned “cardio” equipment like elliptical machines, stationary cycles, and stair climbers, “functional training” staples like stability balls, wobble boards, and plyo boxes, and similar equipment; they are a waste of your clients’ time and a waste of your money and space. Every general, trainable factor of functional ability – muscular strength and stamina, cardiovascular and metabolic conditioning, flexibility, structural integrity/resistance to injury, and body composition – can be improved to a greater degree more quickly, more efficiently, and more safely through the proper use of weight machines, free weights and body weight than through any of the popular alternatives. Don’t do things or buy equipment because you think clients will expect it. Educate them on proper training and why certain things are unnecessary and counterproductive thus not found in your studio.
Since circumstances can vary considerably between training start ups in terms of budget, space, approach to teaching high intensity training, and other factors this may not apply to everybody. If you have questions related to equipping a studio not covered here please post them below. If there is enough interest in this I will write a more detailed guide.
Comments on this entry are closed.
“Stay away from adjustable plate loaded dumbbells, especially starlocks; they take much longer to load and unload than a barbell which can be a problem if you plan to use them for more than one or two exercises in a workout with a different weights.”
Would this mostly refer to the starlock types and not the screw-on types like the Ironmaster Adjustable Bells?
Keith,
I changed “starlock” to “those with screw-on collars” in the article. I don’t recommend any screw-on dumbbells or barbells; they take too much of your time.
Thanks for the article, Drew. What do you think about motorized machines only equipped studio?
Kostya,
I don’t recommend most of the currently available motorized machines. The ARX are probably the best of what’s out there but they have many of the same limitations and make a lot of the same design compromises as regular multi-exercise stations. I would stay far away from the X-Force machines. When I visited the Gainesville Health and Fitness Center with Josh Trentine and Al Coleman to try them out we were appalled at the designs and the function of the weight stacks, and several of the X-Force machines were out of order after being there less than four weeks.
If you can afford motorized machines you’re better off getting RenEx equipment. I didn’t mention them here specifically because they’re outside the budget of most start ups but it’s the best equipment I’ve ever used.
Hi Drew, have you written anything (or could point to a good article) on why RenEx is the best equipment? Cheers
Richard,
I haven’t written anything specific about the RenEx equipment yet but may do so eventually.
Thanks a lot Drew for yet another inspiring post.
Yet again it is all down to how you train rather then how much or even how great machines you use.
I personally love to train on high quality machines as they give me proper isolation for a particular muscle group. Also there are so much easier to teach other on as well. Saying that I love freedom of training at home as I can make an instant decision to do my HIT routine at any time.
Moving on.
What would be your best tip for marketing strategy for promoting small business let say at home when you have minimal equipment and little space available?
Many thanks. Adam
Adam,
I’m not an expert on marketing and have always taken a pretty basic approach, but it’s worked. Get out, socialize, meet people and invite them to work out with you. Network with people in related fields who are influential in your community. Give everybody the best workout possible and encourage them to tell others about it, then reward them for referrals.
Shouldn’t leave out the Nautilus NS-4000 Multi. This thing really doesn’t compromise any of the exercises and has a small footprint
Chris,
I don’t recommend any multi-exercise weight machines for training studios, even the Nautilus. It might be better than competitors, but none of the exercises are as good as the standalone versions because there are compromises. The cable and pulley arrangement in multi-station machines results in higher friction. Leg extensions and seated leg curl machines require different seat bottoms (see my criticism of the Exerbotics Leg Extension/Seated Leg Curl). A chest/incline/overhead press seat modified to allow pull downs using a high cable is a big compromise compared to the Nautilus Lat Pulldown.
Although multi-exercise machines take up less total floor space than all the individual machines required to perform the same exercises because of their size and configuration you are more limited in how you place them or arrange them relative to other equipment and fixtures. There are many things to consider when designing equipment layouts in terms of space and time efficiency, minimizing distractions, privacy, etc. and placing these often requires compromising many of those.
No matter how many exercises can be performed on a station only one person can use it at a time. This is fine if you’re the only trainer but becomes a problem if you have more than one person training at a time.
They are also much more of a hassle to move if you need to rearrange your studio to make room for new equipment or move into another space.
Drew, do you see any way to use kettle bells …unfortunately I have 3 of them…
Joe,
I would use it as a doorstop.
Hi Drew,
I agree with your comments on “multi station” equipment I have access to a Nautilus NS 4000 and I know what you mean by too many compromises with each different station. Whilst multi station gyms might appear to provide a trainer with a lot of different movement options to train clients. Your client isn’t provided with an “optimal” workout and/or the risk of injury is greatly increased.
If your studio is layed out properly regardless of possible limited space you can fit in most required single station exercise machines.
On “cardio” with the new high tech treadmills etc., if equipment is broken down repair cost are extremely high and there are further ongoing maintenanace costs that must be included.
Great article! It highly valuable and informative for budding entrepreneurs who are looking to start their personal training business with the right set of tools.
Choosing the right equipment could mean the make or break of their business. Though teaching the clients the objective of exercise and proper exercise performance is top priority, having the right set of equipment goes a long way towards cutting the time delays associated with teaching proper exercise performance while seriously bringing down the risk of injuries.
Looking forward to a more detailed guide.
Hi Drew,
Is it possible to build a good thigh routine with only TSC leg extensions(on a seated leg curl machine), partial-range barbell hack squat, and maybe squatting with weight plates that have handles in them? Because at the college that I work at has a gym that I can workout at for free, but is not good.
They have no leg extension machine. there two leg presses are not good. I do have a back/ chronic inflammatory problem. I have been performing basically your body weight routine(with RenEx style) at home and I think I need more resistance.
Lastly, If I was to consider spending money for a membership on the cheapest club, that still does not have good leg equipment, and I mostly focused on leg extensions with a RenEx protocol, could that be a good enough thigh routine?
Thanks, John
John,
Some leg press machines are horrible for dynamic exercise but can still be used safely and effectively for timed static contractions if they can be adjusted so you can press against the pedal in the mid range position without it moving.
Timed static contraction hip belt squats are also an option. These would be safer for your back than squatting while holding dumbbells or plates.
What are your thoughts on a full line of Nautilus 1st and 2nd Gen machines?
Dr. Sharp,
When retrofitted with bearings and lower friction weight stacks the Nautilus 1st and 2nd Gen machines are better than the majority of equipment on the market today.
What are your thoughts about a lat tower attachment, which is often an option when purchasing a squat rack?
Have you ever had occasion to try a leverage machine such as sold by PowerTec? This should be much lower friction than a cable based machine?
Craig,
I’ve tried a few of the PowerTec machines but it was a long time ago and I don’t remember much about them other than not liking the way one of the multi-station machines was set up.
Most home lat tower attachments have too much friction. A leverage pull down machine would be a better option if you have the budget and space for it.
One thing I’ve learned the hard way is that plate-loaded equipment is not the ideal set-up when training people for a living. Way too much hassle and way to much wasted time. I will NEVER buy anything other than selectorized machines for my studio from here on out. Just a darn shame the good low-friction stuff tends to be so costly. I am very averse to high overhead, and simply wait for deals to pop up on Craigslist. One more thought when training others for a living…I don’t think free-weights are worth the risk of injury with a client. Especially any movement involving weights being above the client, with potential to fall on them. Many, many people are simply very, very ADD and/or clumsy by nature, and they need a training environment which protects them form themself in a manner of speaking.
Jeff,
I prefer selectorized equipment for training due to the greater efficiency, however plate loading equipment tends to be less expensive and unlike selectorized machines is capable of providing much higher levels of resistance, which is necessary when you are working with very strong athletes. When I was in college I trained Jeff Wilner and Seth Dittman who were playing for the Green Bay Packers at the time, and both of them were able to max out almost all of the MedX machines we had in reasonably good form.
Regeneration Equipment has come up with a novel solution to make plate loading far more efficient for those considering new plate loaded machines.
While free weights pose a greater risk of injury than machines a lot of this depends on the trainee and the specific exercises, and much of the risk can be minimized with proper instruction and supervision and by performing certain exercises inside of a rack with safety bars.
I was so glad to see your comment on all those core and agility, balance & coordination gizmos – like the wobble boards, half balls, etc, being a waste of time and money! I’m 62, been working out since 1968, spent a quarter century as a health club owner (my last club was over 20,000 sf), and am currently certified as a PT. I see virtually all trainers at any gym I visit constantly doing the strangest exercises with clients, many of whom don’t seem to be having much fun.
I thought I was just “old school”, believing as you said, that the proven time-tested exercises, ie the presses, pulldowns, rows, and so on- accomplish every major objective that most clients desire. Until reading your article I was – reluctantly – going to force myself to learn how to use all those gizmos, and then teach them to clients. But now I’m going to happily stay the course and stick to my old school ways.
Incidentally, I’m converting a one car garage into a fitness studio, and my featured piece of equipment will be a Functional Trainer, and also have the select Tech style DBs, recumbent bike, and more. Wondering what you think of Resistance Tubes?
Thanks a million Drew,
Gino K
Hey Gino,
You’re welcome, and you’re on the right track. Outside of physical therapy for certain neuromuscular problems there is no reason to use wobble boards, balls, or other balance devices since these reduce the effectiveness of exercise and balance skills do not transfer to other activities.
I do not like resistance tubes. The resistance they provide is backwards to the strength curve of most movements. You’re better off using dumbbells or a multi-angle cable machine.
I am currently training at home with a very basic set up which has been working very well, including a UXS, power rack, adjustable bench, various Olympic bars, and the SelectTech Dumbbells.
Hi Drew. I love the site, but I have a question concerning the following
“Stay away from multi-exercise stations like those commonly found in hotel and apartment fitness centers. Most are very poorly designed, compromising the quality of exercise movements for the sake of quantity.”
Do you mind elaborating on this point a bit more? When you say they compromise the quality of exercise do you mean they put you in an awkward position and are detrimental to the exercise performed? And if so how big of a difference does it make in comparison to a higher quality machine?
Hey Oracle,
Most of the multi-exercise stations I’ve seen have very poor adjustability and paths of movement, and are often very poorly constructed, using bushings instead of bearings in pulleys and movement arm articulations, and weight stacks with high levels of friction.
Hey Drew,
I guess your opinion re the motorized ARX multi-exercise station has changed a bit since you published this post, looking at what you wrote about it elsewhere.
By the way, I didn’t know the RenEx machines were also motorized.
Also, I once trained on a Nautilus piece of equipment which is a bit complicated to describe. You could perform several exercises on it, but I’m not sure it classified as a multi-exercise station. If I understand correctly what a multi-exercise station is, it has to have a single place where you can sit, right? Well, that Nautilus thing had four different places where you could sit. Does that count as four standalone machines rather than a single station? The funny thing is, they were all attached to each other, and standalone machines are not, I figure. I’m also not sure the weight stack was shared by those. Um, I may have pictures of it somewhere, I could upload them somewhere if I find them. Have I bumped into some kind of hybrid between a single multi-exercise station and several standalone machines? A compromise, you know.
Anyway, I’m thinking about buying a few pieces of equipment to train at home, and I was wondering, do you think I should definitely go for an adjustable one? Isn’t a simple flat, non-adjustable utility bench enough? The only well-known exercise I can think of that couldn’t be done on that is the incline bench press, or am I mistaken? And is the incline bench press actually a fundamental exercise? Several strength trainers say that you would be all set with the flat bench press only. Maybe the incline bench press would add variety, which is nice, but don’t the flat bench press with a barbell and dumbbells and the pushup provide enough of it already? That’s three exercises, do you really need a fourth? The question could also be formulated like this: Do you think the incline bench press and the flat bench press are significantly different from each other, providing significantly different kinds of results? There’s a bit of a debate out there about this. Whatever the case, I think you’d agree with me that a flat, non-adjustable bench press is almost always going to be more sturdy than an adjustable bench press. I think that should be taken into account when deciding what to buy.
Thank you,
Maigret
Hey Maigret,
ARX makes great machines, but they are not the best option for larger personal training studios. RenEx machines use computers to measure and display force input but they are not motorized.
The Nautilus machine you are talking about was their “Time Machine” which was basically a bunch of machines sharing a single frame to save space, but which could function independently of each other. The problem is when a single station on a machine is designed for multiple exercises which always involves compromises or when multiple stations share a weight stack which can increase friction significantly and cause other problems.
If you’re only going to buy one bench I would recommend an adjustable one with at least flat, incline, and upright settings and an adjustable seat angle. These can be useful for more than just presses and flyes, and you may later decide to include exercises in your workouts that require one. Good commercial adjustable benches are very sturdy. If you need help designing your home gym and selecting the best equipment for your space and budget I’m available for consultations.
Hey Drew,
Thank you for your answer.
I trust your advice, I’ll get an adjustable bench.
Um, yes, the Nautilus piece of equipment I was thinking about was probably the “Time Machine”, I googled a bit for photographs and it appears that’s it.
I’m in the process of reading tons of your blog entries. If your website was a book, I could say that I’m reading it almost cover to cover. I’m planning to buy a few of your ebooks as soon as I’m finished.
Maigret