Home > Miscellaneous > Interview on Functional Training on ConditioningResearch.com

Interview on Functional Training on ConditioningResearch.com

Chris Highcock just posted an excellent interview with Luke Carlson on functional training at ConditioningResearch.com Luke does an excellent job of explaining the relationships between proper strength training, skill training and functional ability and dispells many popular misconceptions about training to improve athletic ability.

Share, Print or E-mail:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Drew Baye Miscellaneous

Get Free Blog Updates:
  1. Paul Wylie
    April 22nd, 2009 at 08:12 | #1

    Great interview, so many thanks Drew for posting the link. It’s important the public get to understand the conning of “Functional Training” circus acts with gimmicks!

  2. April 27th, 2009 at 18:02 | #2

    Thanks for the link Drew. This stuff is certainly generating some debate.

  3. April 28th, 2009 at 09:34 | #3

    Anybody who disagrees doesn’t understand the subject.

  4. April 28th, 2009 at 18:09 | #4

    It is my impression that few people really understand what is being said. They just react when something challenges the status quo or the current accepted wisdom.

  5. Dale Dykes
    May 2nd, 2009 at 13:36 | #5

    Drew -

    Only slightly off-topic, I rarely, if ever, see HIT proponents emphasizing ‘corrective exercise’ or ‘unilateral training’, both of which are all-the-rage in fitness circles these days.

    Is there a reason for this ?

  6. May 14th, 2009 at 15:29 | #6

    Dale,

    The reason for this is most likely that HIT is based on science, rather than the latest fads. While there are places for these things, their use by many mainstream personal trainers probably has more to do with following trends than providing clients with effective training.

  7. Chris Collins
    August 2nd, 2009 at 19:22 | #7

    Good to see. I would also recommend ‘System Analysis’ by Brian D. Johnston of The IART; this covers a few topics but it has a chapter of 40-odd pages on Paul Chek and functional training, which comprehensively de-bunks it. Actually there’s probably more than you would need for a discussion but worth buying nevertheless.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Web Analytics