High Intensity Training Or High Density Training?

High Intensity Training (HIT)  is progressive resistance exercise performed with high level of effort. High Density Training (HDT) is progressive resistance exercise performed with a high work to rest ratio. Although it is possible to perform HIT without performing HDT by allowing a long rest between exercises, most HIT methods are HDT and are performed with little to no rest in between. Recently some trainers have been using the term in an attempt to differentiate themselves or sell programs, however HDT is nothing new and neither are these programs. Nautilus inventor Arthur Jones was recommending moving between exercises as quickly as possible back in the 1970’s and most HIT methods which evolved from Arthur Jones’ Nautilus training principles still involve the “rush factor.”

There are several benefits to moving quickly between exercises. Doing so significantly increases the demands on the cardiovascular system and the conditioning effect of a workout, as well as the metabolic demand on muscle groups targeted by two or more consecutive exercises. Due to cumulative systemic and local muscular fatigue rushing between exercises reduces the resistance required for subsequent exercises resulting in progressively deeper inroading and reduced stress on joints and connective tissue. Most obviously, rushing between exercises makes it possible to complete a workout very quickly making it a more viable way to train for people with tight schedules.

Project Total Conditioning

Some people promoting variations of HDT recommend performing repetitions more quickly for the sake of performing a higher density of mechanical work per time. This is not necessary to achieve the aforementioned benefits however, and as repetition speed increases so does the difficulty in maintaining strict form and the risk of injury. Performing repetitions slowly is both safer and more effective. The time you spend under load and the tension and metabolic stress on the target muscles are what matters, not how many times you make a weight go up and down.

The easiest way to move quickly between exercises is using selectorized machines like those made by Nautilus or MedX because it takes very little time to adjust settings and move the selector pin up or down the weight stack. Selectorized dumbbells are effective for this purpose as well. The same can be done with free weights if you have enough barbells and/or dumbbell handles and weight plates to load up all of your exercises ahead of time, but this would be impractical in most gyms and is usually only an option for people who train at home. The best way to accomplish this if you work out at a gym using either free weights or plate-loaded machines is to have a workout partner load the weight plates one exercise ahead of you and reserve the bar or machine then unload when you complete each exercise (if you are using a moderately slow repetition cadence and moderate rep range this gives them plenty of time). Another option is to perform bodyweight exercises, since there is usually little or no equipment to set up, and if you know how to perform bodyweight exercises correctly you can make them as easy or hard as necessary for your current level of strength.

As a general rule, if you want the greatest overall improvements in functional ability and health you should move slowly during exercises and quickly between them, not the other way around. HDT programs are nothing new, though. HIT has already incorporated this for decades.

References:

1. James Peterson, PhD., Total Conditioning: A Case Study, Athletic Journal Vol. 56 September, 1975

2. Maisch B, Baum E, Grimm W. Die Auswirkungen dynamischen Krafttrainings nach dem Nautilus-Prinzip auf kardiozirkulatorische Parameter und Ausdauerleistungsfähigkeit (The effects of resistance training according to the Nautilus principles on cardiocirculatory parameters and endurance). Angenommen vom Fachbereich Humanmedizin der Philipps-Universität Marburg am 11. Dezember 2003

Join the discussion or ask questions about this post in the HIT List forum

Like it? Share it!

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • Fabio Apr 27, 2015 @ 15:04

    Hi Drew,

    What do you think about Single Density Training to optimize the muscle mass?

    For example, performing 50 repetitions (10 RM) in 10 minutes.

    Your answer is greatly appreciated, Thank you.

    Fabio

    • Drew Baye Apr 27, 2015 @ 17:05

      Hey Fabio,

      There is no reason to do this. If your goal is muscular strength and size increases and you’re performing multiple sets every set after the first is unnecessary and potentially counterproductive. Or, if you’re performing the fifty reps continuously for ten minutes the time under load is way too long and the tension way too low. If your goal is cardiovascular and metabolic conditioning you would be much better off performing a single circuit consisting of one set of exercises covering different muscle groups rather than repeat the same exercise for ten minutes.

  • Al Apr 29, 2015 @ 8:51

    Hi Drew, I am a little confused. Let’s say I do chest press and reach failure in about 7 reps, and since each rep takes about 10 seconds, my TUL is 70 seconds. So that’s it? I should call it a day and not do further sets? I am confused bcuz people say for fast twitch like chest, TUL is kept under 90 seconds, so if I reach failure in 70 seconds, wouldn’t my chest workout be over in just 70 seconds?

    Or does it mean I should do multiple sets and each set should have a TUL of under 90 seconds? I am utterly confused by all the conflicting information reg. this. Hope u can clarify this TUL stuff – whether the total TUL for chest is under 90 seconds or whether TUL for each set should be under 90 seconds?

    • Drew Baye Apr 29, 2015 @ 9:18

      Hey Al,

      The range of repetitions that can be effective is very broad, but some individuals respond better to slightly lower or higher reps and time in general, and some people will find some muscle groups respond better to lower or higher reps and time (total time under load is more important than the number of reps performed in that time, however). I recommend most people start with something in the middle of the 30 to 90 second range, but like almost everything it may need to be adjusted based on individual response. I cover this in detail in the chapter Finding Your Optimal Repetition Range in High Intensity Workouts.

  • Al Apr 29, 2015 @ 12:52

    Thanks, Drew. You said:total time under load is more important than the number of reps performed in that time, however.

    What about this scenario: TUL with more weights is 50 seconds, whereas TUL with less weights (but due to slower repetitions) is also 50 seconds. Are they both equal or one better than the other?