Archive

Archive for August, 2009

American Council on Exercise Responds to Time Magazine Article

August 21st, 2009

The American Council on Exercise has now also released a statement about the Time magazine article, and are just as mistaken in most of their points as the American College of Sports Medicine in their response. The following is their editorial (inset) along with my comments:

Editorial: Why Time Magazine’s Article on Exercise and Weight Loss Could Be Harmful to Your Health
By Cedric X. Bryant, Ph.D., F.A.C.S.M., Chief Science Officer, American Council on Exercise
The cover story of the August 9, 2009, issue of Time magazine featured an article entitled, “Why Exercise Won’t Make You Thin.” In this piece, author John Cloud made several inaccurate and unsubstantiated claims regarding the value of exercise, particularly as it relates to weight loss. What follows is a summary of some of the most misleading assertions made in this highly publicized article, as well as the American Council on Exercise’s response to these assertions:
? First and foremost, the article categorically implies that exercise has no meaningful role in weight loss. Such a conclusion is as false as it is reckless. The author’s “evidence” is the fact that he has “gut fat that hangs over his belt when he sits,” despite maintaining a regular exercise habit. In all likelihood, his unwanted abdominal girth is probably a by-product of genetics and/or consuming more calories than he expends.
? Weight loss and maintenance are a matter of simple accounting that is dependent upon energy balance. In order for weight loss to occur, individuals must burn more calories than they consume. Regrettably, many individuals who regularly exercise are unable to meet their weight-loss goals because they eat too much. In reality, however, their “personal weight situation” and overall health profile would be far worse were it not for the extra calories they expend while exercising.
? An overwhelming body of scientific evidence exists that confirms the positive role that exercise plays in weight loss and maintenance (Hill and Wyatt, 2005; Jakicic and Gallagher, 2003; Jakicic et al., 2001). These findings refute the notion (advanced by the author) that exercise impairs weight-loss efforts by substantially and uncontrollably increasing appetite. Recent research suggests that appetite may be suppressed for 60-90 minutes following vigorous exercise by affecting the release of certain appetite hormones. It also appears that aerobic exercise is more effective at suppressing appetite than non-aerobic forms of exercise (Broom et al., 2009). In general, individuals who participate in moderate exercise tend to eat approximately the same number of calories (or only slightly more) than they would if they did not exercise. Elite-level athletes typically consume high volumes of food after their exercise workouts, but they almost always expend more calories than they consumed (Blundell and King, 1999). It is important to keep in mind, however, that appetite is influenced several factors and is a very complex process making it difficult to generalize the impact of exercise on appetite. The bottom-line is that exercise and diet go hand-in-hand with successful weight management.
? Surprisingly (and disappointingly) the author failed to mention the tremendously important role that exercise plays in the maintenance of weight loss. According to data from the renowned National Weight Control Registry, consistent exercise participation is the single best predictor of long-term weight maintenance. In others words, if individuals want to be successful in getting off the weight-loss rollercoaster (i.e., repeatedly losing weight and regaining it), they need to regularly engage in physical activity.
? Another particularly bothersome portion of the article was the misleading comments regarding children and physical activity. A preponderance of evidence shows that kids are often less active after school, not more active as the article implies. As such, community-based youth fitness programs and high-quality school physical education programs are much needed. The available statistics support the fact that well-designed fitness programs aimed at encouraging children to be more active and maintain a healthy body weight remain a significant priority (HHS, 2008).
Needless to say, readers of this article in Time are likely to conclude that exercise is of little to no benefit to them, which makes its publication in such a high profile and respected magazine so disappointing—and possibly even dangerous. Given the enormous economic costs associated with obesity (approximately $147 billion annually), we should be promoting and advocating scientifically proven healthful behaviors like regular exercise participation whenever and wherever we can. Beyond its weight-control benefits, regular exercise provides a plethora of health benefits, including the treatment and prevention of a wide variety of chronic illnesses (heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, certain types of cancer, to name a few), an enhancement of psychological health and well-being, and an improvement in the overall quality of life throughout the human lifespan.
References
Blundell, J.E. & King, N.A. (1999). Physical activity and regulation of food intake: Current evidence.Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 31, 11 Suppl., S573-S583.
Broom, D.R. et al. (2009). Influence of resistance and aerobic exercise on hunger, circulating levels of acylated ghrelin, peptide YY in healthy males. American Journal of Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 296, 1, R29-35.
Hill, J.O. and Wyatt, H.R. (2005). Role of physical activity in preventing and treating obesity.Journal of Applied Physiology, 99, 765-770.
Jakicic, J.M. & Gallagher, K.I. (2003). Exercise considerations for the sedentary, overweight adult.Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 31, 2, 91-95.
Jakicic, J.M. et al. (2001). ACSM position stand on the appropriate intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 33, 2145-2156.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2008). 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services.

Editorial: Why Time Magazine’s Article on Exercise and Weight Loss Could Be Harmful to Your Health

By Cedric X. Bryant, Ph.D., F.A.C.S.M., Chief Science Officer, American Council on Exercise

The cover story of the August 9, 2009, issue of Time magazine featured an article entitled, “Why Exercise Won’t Make You Thin.” In this piece, author John Cloud made several inaccurate and unsubstantiated claims regarding the value of exercise, particularly as it relates to weight loss. What follows is a summary of some of the most misleading assertions made in this highly publicized article, as well as the American Council on Exercise’s response to these assertions:

  • First and foremost, the article categorically implies that exercise has no meaningful role in weight loss. Such a conclusion is as false as it is reckless. The author’s “evidence” is the fact that he has “gut fat that hangs over his belt when he sits,” despite maintaining a regular exercise habit. In all likelihood, his unwanted abdominal girth is probably a by-product of genetics and/or consuming more calories than he expends.

First off, I should clarify most people’s goal is not indiscriminate weight loss, but improved body composition. This means improving the ratio of muscle to fat, and in most people’s case requiring a significant reduction in fat while minimally maintaining muscle mass. If a person lost 10 pounds of muscle they’d have lost weight, but would look worse and be weaker and less fit. So while ACE use the term weight loss, I’m going to write fat loss, because that’s what people really want.

Second, while genetics plays a role, with a few very rare exceptions it is not an excuse for being fat. Being fat is almost entirely a matter of overeating, and not, as Bryan partly implies in the phrase “…consuming more calories than he expends” that low expenditure is the problem.

I got ripped for a bodybuilding competition doing one high intensity strength training workout per week consisting of only one set each of a few exercises, and lasting around 15 to 20 minutes. Other than that, I was training clients, attending classes or labs, or studying, and actually went out of my way to be less active, as part of the point of entering the contest was to demonstrate it could be done without “cardio”. Clients who follow my nutritional advice consistently lose bodyfat without doing any exercise or increasing their activity levels beyond the one or two weekly workouts they do with me. Read more…

Drew Baye Fat Loss

How Many Calories Is Your Time Worth?

August 17th, 2009

Fitness and weight loss “experts” like to recommend finding ways to incorporate more physical activity into daily life, usually exchanging efficiency or convenience for increased physical exertion, based on the mistaken belief that doing so makes a meaningful contribution to health, fitness, or fat loss. They claim these little changes add up to a lot of calories burned over the course of a week, however this is not the case. If hour-long “cardio” sessions barely burn enough calories to be worth doing for that purpose, a few minutes walking up the stairs or across a parking lot are hardly going to amount to any calories burned, while reducing your time and productivity.

Unless you enjoy these activities for their own sake, doing them to burn calories is not worth your time. You could accomplish as much of negative calorie balance in a single day with a few dietary changes as the typical recommendations for increases in activity would amount to over several weeks, without it costing a minute of your time.

In a recent post I mentioned a study from the 2009 European Congress on Obesity (Swinburn BA, et al “Increased energy intake alone virtually explains all the increase in body weight in the United States from 1970s to the 2000s” ECO 2009.) which showed a lack of activity is not the problem. Overeating is. If you want to lose fat, forget about spending a few extra minutes walking an extra block to work; you’ll barely burn the amount of calories contained in a few french fries. Instead, save yourself a few minutes and skip the french fries to begin with.

The following are just a few suggestions for dietary improvements that will make a much bigger difference in fat loss than adding a few minutes of extra activity throughout your day:

  • Eliminate or minimize intake of grains and other refined carbohydrates.
  • Replace them with a variety of fresh vegetables and fruits, especially leafy vegetables and berries.
  • Choose leaner sources of protein – some fats are healthy in moderate amounts but fat is very calorie dense.
  • Substitute water or other non-caloric beverages like tea for sodas and fruit juices.

This is not to say I believe people should be inactive. There are other benefits to getting up and moving around. However, doing so makes little or no positive difference in body composition.

The only worthwhile exercise for improving body composition is strength training. High intensity strength training in particular provides the greatest physical benefits relative to the time invested, including all of the cardiovascular and metabolic benefits of aerobics or “cardio”. Strength training directly improves body composition by increasing muscle mass and by preventing loss of muscle mass while fat is lost in people restricting calorie intake, and indirectly because more muscle mass equals a higher basal metabolic rate and more storage space for glucose (as glycogen). High intensity strength training also depletes muscle glycogen levels, so more of the carbohydrate consumed is stored as glycogen in the muscles than as triglycerides in the fat cells.

So, if you’re in a hurry to get to work or have better things to do with your time, go ahead and take the elevator or park in the closest spot – you’re not missing out on any kind of major calorie-burning or conditioning benefits. If you need to lose fat, focus on improving your diet instead.

Drew Baye Fat Loss

High Intensity Bodybuilding Book Will Be Available As E-Book

August 16th, 2009

The upcoming high intensity bodybuilding book will be released as both a paperback and an e-book. The finish line is in sight, and I’m finally happy with the way it’s reading. A big part of the process has been trimming the fat to keep things focused and concise and structuring the book so people can find the information they want quickly and easily.

Anyone who purchases a phone consultation or distance training package between now and the book release (estimated release date 9/14/09) will receive both the paperback and e-book versions free. For the first 30 days after the book is released, anyone who purchases either the paperback or e-book will receive a discount equal to the purchase cost on a phone consultation or distance training package.

In a few weeks I will also be offering an intensive 12-week fat loss program locally which will be available to a limited number of participants and include workout program and diet design. More information will be posted before the end of this month.

Drew Baye Miscellaneous

American College of Sports Medicine Responds to Time Magazine article

August 12th, 2009

My friend Anthony Semone informed me the ACSM have posted a press release titled “Experts Debunk Myth About Exercise, Weight Loss” in response to the Time Magazine article covered in my previous post. The following is the full text of their press release (inset) along with my comments:

EXPERTS DEBUNK MYTH ABOUT EXERCISE, WEIGHT LOSS
Research proves value of exercise, nutrition

According to John Jakicic, Ph.D., FACSM, “There is strong evidence from the majority of the scientific literature that physical activity is an important component for initial weight loss.”

INDIANAPOLIS – Leading experts in exercise and weight management have taken strong exception to assertions that exercise can inhibit weight loss by over-stimulating the appetite.

The “experts” can take exception all they like, but it does not change the fact increased activity stimulates appetite and if a person is not measuring and restricting calorie intake they are more likely to end up with a positive energy balance, resulting in an increase in body fat. While exercise burns very few calories, hardly enough to be worth doing for that purpose, a large amount of calories is very easy to consume.

General physical activity and the types of exercise commonly recommended for fat loss contribute relatively little to a fat loss program, and will make either no difference at all or even make things worse if diet is not being controlled. Read more…

Drew Baye Fat Loss

Time Magazine Says Exercise Won’t Make You Lose Weight

August 11th, 2009

The August 17, 2009 issue of Time Magazine contains an article that is going to piss off a lot of people in the fitness industry, because it challenges one of the biggest myths that have been lining the pockets of gyms, trainers, and equipment companies for years: that exercise will make you lose weight.

The article by John Cloud, Why Exercise Won’t Make You Thin, explains how exercise, which does not burn a significant amount of calories to begin with, stimulates an increase in appetite and compensatory eating. According to one study, this compensatory eating may exceed the calories burned during the activity by as much as 100 – enough to cause a fat gain of over 10 pounds per year. One study mentioned showed no difference in fat loss between three exercising groups and a non-exercising control. This is bad news for aerobics instructors and trainers selling various types of “cardio” classes as an effective method of fat loss.

Actually, this is not news at all. I’ve been telling people this for years, and the people at Nautilus were saying the same thing way back in the ’70s. No activity burns enough calories to be worth doing solely for that purpose. The biggest contribution exercise makes to a fat loss program is the preservation of lean body mass while fat is lost. Any contribution to increased calorie expenditure, either as a direct result of the workout or indirectly as a result of increased muscle mass, is minor compared to the role of diet. Read more…

Drew Baye Fat Loss

Web Analytics