Archive

Archive for January, 2009

My Current Training Routine

January 29th, 2009

A few people have asked about my current routine. I am posting it only as an example of what I am doing, not as an exact recommendation for others to follow. What works well for me may or may not work well for you depending on differences in genetics and environmental factors.

I train once every five days, alternating between two workouts:

Workout A

  1. Barbell Squat
  2. Weighted Chin Up
  3. Barbell Press
  4. Barbell Wrist Curl
  5. Barbell Wrist Extension

Workout B

  1. Shrug Bar Deadlift
  2. Weighted Parallel Bar Dip
  3. One-Armed Dumbbell Row
  4. One-Legged Standing Calf Raise with Dumbbell

I will occasionally add direct arm work, but not more than once every couple of weeks. Once I am finished refurbishing my Nautilus 4-Way Neck machine I will also be performing neck extension and flexion twice monthly (once every 3rd workout).

I perform one set of 3 to 5 repetitions, with an approximate 3 second positive, a brief pause in the fully contracted position (except on pressing movements), a 10 second negative, and a brief pause at the start position. The time under load per exercise averages 45 to 75 seconds. Each set is continued to the point of positive failure, and the weight is increased slightly whenever I can perform 5 or more complete repetitions in strict form. I do not rush between exercises, but I do not rest for longer than necessary to set up the weights, either.

The principles behind the current routine are discussed in detail in the upcoming book, High Intensity Training: Principles and Applications for Bodybuilding.

Drew Baye Miscellaneous

Safety Considerations for Exercise

January 26th, 2009

The following is a handout I wrote for new personal training clients several years ago. I have reposted it here at the request of several people and to save myself time answering many of the questions it addresses. The upcoming book contains more current, expanded discussions of each of the considerations covered here as well as many others. I will also be posting an updated, condensed version of the safety section from the book after it is published as a PDF for in-the-gym and phone training clients.

Safety Considerations for Exercise

Exercise, when properly performed, can stimulate the body to produce dramatic improvements in muscular strength and endurance, bone strength, cardiovascular efficiency, flexibility, and body composition. However, when improperly performed, exercise can produce injury. There are several general safety considerations which must be observed to reduce the risk of serious injury during exercise. Read more…

Drew Baye Training

High Intensity Training Book Update and Other News

January 26th, 2009

The first draft of the book looks like it will be finished before the end of February, and I will be starting photography and illustration for it shortly. I have been working on this on and off for a few years now, and am glad to be almost finished. More information and short excerpts from the book will be posted after I begin editing later in Feb. The book will only be available through this web site. Those who purchase the book within the first 30 days will receive a discount on a phone consultation or phone training package equal to the cost of the book, and each person who purchases a phone training package will receive a free copy of the book.

I recently picked up a copy of the Paleo Cookbook: Recipes for the 21st Century Hunter-Gatherer and will be reviewing it here later this week. We’ve tried a few of the recipes, and they taste good and are easy to prepare. I especially enjoyed the Bombay Chicken Skewers.

Recently, there’s been more of the typical rep speed and protocol arguments on the high intensity training professionals e-mail list. Sadly, there a lot of SuperSlow instructors who still can’t accept that SuperSlow is not the ultimate exercise protocol and continue to make unfounded claims about it’s superiority.  The following are excerpts from a response I wrote to the list I wanted to share here:

Ultimately, only two things matter: safety and progression. Whatever you’re doing, however you’re doing it, it needs to be reasonably safe and there needs to be systematic progression. While the principles are the same for everybody, the application needs to vary based on individual condition, goals, and response to exercise. Anybody claiming a specific protocol or program is the best way for everybody, all the time, is wrong.

Rep speed needs to be slow enough to allow for good turnarounds and proper form. Exactly how slow this needs to be may vary a bit from person to person depending on their condition and their motor ability. Someone who has no joint problems and is very strong and has very good motor ability may be able to train safely at a faster speed than someone with osteoporosis and poor motor ability. If in doubt, it is better to move too slowly than too quickly, but most of the SuperSlow people grossly overestimate the difference in force involved between typical high intensity training cadences and SuperSlow. There is only a few percent difference between a 2 and 10 second positive, and less than one percent difference between a 4 and 10 second positive. While SuperSlow may certainly be a safer bet for most people – again, better to go too slow than too fast – there is no proof very slow reps produce better muscular strength or size increases in the long run. Any speed slow enough to allow smooth turnarounds, proper body positioning and movement over the full ROM performed, and that doesn’t result in any unusual pain or soreness is slow enough.

Within reason, rep range/time under load depends on the individual. Some people will do better with fewer reps/shorter times, some with more/longer. If it works for you, great, if not, make adjustments, note how your body responds, and keep adjusting until you start getting the desired result. In my experience, lower rep ranges/TULs have worked better for producing muscular strength and size increases in the younger men I have trained, and I have a few clients who put on 10+ pounds of muscle over a few month period using 7-10 reps at 3/3 (about 40 to 60 seconds). I also have clients using longer times, in some cases 10 to 15 reps (60 to 90 seconds). This has worked well for several older clients who seemed to have a hard time with weight increases after 12 reps (we start people at 8 to 12 and adjust based on how they respond).

As for different positive/negative ratios, while I’m sure there is some effect – mainly due to the differences in energetics between the positive and negative – I don’t know of any evidence for the superiority of doing one significantly shorter or longer than the other, other than one study by Westcott, but after speaking with Westcott about his studies a while back and learning they are not using stopwatches to consistently time subjects, I am skeptical. That study showed a 4/10 to be slightly more effective than a 10/4. If anybody remembers which of Westcott’s books this is in, I’d appreciate it if you could tell me, because I just flipped through a few and could not find it.

Regarding the last paragraph in the excerpt above, I had a discussion with high intensity trainer and exercise physiologist Ryan Hall recently about different variables of growth stimulation and how different positive/negative durations might affect these, and will be discussing some of it in the book. I have contacted Wayne Westcott about the study I mentioned above, and he said he will fax copies of it when he gets a chance, which I will post about here when I receive them.

Drew Baye Miscellaneous

Q&A: Recreational Activity on Recovery Days

January 26th, 2009

Hey Drew,

I have been reading about HIT and it seems great, because I can fit it in to an hour or so in my schedule.
I have questions though.

1) I play a bit of Soccer and Basketball. Not seriously, but I enjoy them and would hate to miss out on them… Would it be a bad idea to play on rest days between workouts?

2) Would the lack of cardio affect my endurance in these sports adversely?

Thanks in advance

If you enjoy playing soccer and basketball you should structure your workouts around them, not the other way around. Exercise should contribute to the enjoyment of other activities in your life, not replace them. If you find that you do not recover as quickly between workouts due to the additional activity, then add extra recovery days between workouts.

High intensity strength training produces greater metabolic and cardiovascular benefits than traditional cardio, more safely and more efficiently, so as long as you’re still doing your strength training workouts you won’t be missing anything. Although the metabolic and cardiovascular benefits of HIT are of a more general nature, if you’re playing soccer and basketball regularly you will get all the specific conditioning you require from those.

Drew Baye Miscellaneous

Site Update

January 25th, 2009

I am in the process of updating the look and organization of the site. There may be some problems accessing certain areas while this is occurring, but the site should be fully functional within a week.

Drew Baye Miscellaneous

The Minimum Amount Necessary

January 18th, 2009

The following article was originally published on Cyberpump.com in 1998.

Recently I’ve been receiving a lot of e-mail and phone calls from people with questions regarding their workouts. Often, people are surprised at the brevity of the routines I recommend, and ask, “why so few exercises?” To which I respond, why do any more? Why perform any more exercise than the minimal amount necessary to stimulate growth in all the major muscle groups?

It is unnecessary, and even counterproductive to do any more exercise than is minimally required to stimulate growth in all of the major muscular structures. More exercise than this will not stimulate more growth, but it will use up more energy and metabolic resources, which leaves your body with less to recover from and produce the muscular growth stimulated by the workout. While I do not believe that it is possible to exercise too intensely, or that the majority of people train anywhere near as intensely as they are truly capable of, I know for a fact that it is very easy to perform too much exercise and believe that the majority of people would benefit from a reduction in the volume of their training. Read more…

Drew Baye Training

BodyByScience.net is Online

January 14th, 2009

The companion web site for John Little and Doug McGuff, MD’s book Body by Science is now online at www.bodybyscience.net

The site already contains a few posts and articles, and looks like it will be a great resource for those interested in the science behind high intensity training.

Drew Baye Miscellaneous

T.G.I.M?

January 12th, 2009

I’m active on a couple social networking web sites, including Facebook, where Monday is often met with disparaging comments about being back at work. No matter how much you love your job there are probably other things you’d like to be doing, and the weekends always seem to go by too quickly. Many look at the weekdays as something to be endured, counting the days until the next weekend.

One particular comment I read this morning reminded me of a story Ken Hutchins told me about an incident involving a Nautilus employee and Arthur Jones, back when Arthur was still running Nautilus. I don’t recall the name of the employee or exactly what was said, but one Friday Arthur overheard an employee say “T.G.I.F.” and gave him a pretty severe chewing out, ending with the point the employee should be thanking God he had a job to go to at the beginning of each week.

While I’m not a religious person (and I don’t believe Arthur was either) I agree with the general sentiment of his point. Even if you can’t stand your job, you should be happy you have one to go to Monday morning (or whenever your work week starts), because there are a lot of people out there right now who don’t and who would gladly take yours if given the opportunity.

Drew Baye Miscellaneous

Michigan State Football Strength Clinic

January 7th, 2009

I just received word via John Wood’s Functional Hand Strength mailing list Ken Leistner will be emcee’ing and speaking at the Michigan State Football Strength Clinic, Saturday January 31st at the Clara Bell Smith Academic Center at Michigan State University.

The fee will be $75, which includes lunch. Payment must be sent by mail, as they aren’t set up to accept credit cards.

For information, directions, etc. contact MSU assistant strength coach Mike Vorkapich at 517-432-1822 or by email at vork@ath.msu.edu

Since this information is coming from John Wood, please tell Mike you heard about it from him when calling. If you’re within a reasonable driving distance from Michigan State or will be anywhere in the area around that time I highly recommend attending, as it’s sure to be informative and it sounds like there will be a lot of other great speakers.

UPDATE:

I just received the following information on the clinic from Mike Vorkapich:

The Spartan Strength & Conditioning Staff would like to invite you and your fellow coaches to the 2nd Annual MSU Strength & Conditioning Clinic for Football.  The clinic is designed to give all football coaches,  a solid foundation in the basic fundamentals of strength training, speed mechanics and agility training.
Speakers include:
Dr. Ken Leistner – Master of Ceremonies
Mike Gittleson – Legendary University of Michigan Strength Coach
Dr. Ted Lambrinides – Athletic Strength & Power (ASAP)
Aaron Hillmann – Director of Strength & Conditioning, Bowling Green State University
Randy Gillon – Michigan State University Football Speed Coach
Jim Kielbaso – Total Performance Training Center – Wixom, MI
Carlo Alvarez – Head Strength & Conditioning Coach @ perennial power St. Xavier HS, Cincinnati, OH
+ Ken Mannie and the rest of the Spartan Strength Staff

WHEN: Saturday, January 31, 2009.*Registration & Check-in @ 730-830am

WHERE: Clara Bell Smith Academic Center

COST: $75.00 Pre-registered via mail

ITINERARY: The clinic itinerary will be emailed to preregistered coaches.

Drew Baye Miscellaneous

Home Versus Commercial Gym

January 6th, 2009

Home and commercial gyms both have advantages and disadvantages. Which one is right for you will depend primarily on your available space and budget, and what best meets your training needs and lifestyle.

Space

If you don’t have the space in your home or apartment for a gym, this is a moot point. However, the amount of space required to get a good workout is actually very small. A doorway chin up bar takes up no floor space, and a pair of adjustable dumbbells which take up almost no space at all can provide a complete workout. Check out Matt Brzycki and Fred Fornicola’s book Dumbbell Training for Strength and Fitness for examples.

With nothing but an Olympic bar and enough plates, which only requires about a 10 x 4 foot space, you can perform exercises that hit all the major muscle groups:

  1. Deadlift (hips, thighs, lower back, upper back, traps)
  2. Press (shoulders, triceps, traps)
  3. Curl (biceps)
  4. Push Ups (chest, shoulders, triceps)
  5. Standing Calf Raise (calves)
  6. Weighted Crunch (abs)

There are dozens more you could do, but you only need a few. If you have a little more room you can fit a power rack and a flat bench, and add squats and bench press. Many power racks have chinning bars built in them as well, and I recommend this or a free-standing chinning station rather than a doorway chinning bar if you are over 200 pounds or if you’re doing weighted chin ups. Read more…

Drew Baye Training

Web Analytics